STAKEMASTER View all content
Tipsters — How to tell if a tipster is truly profitable
Tipsters 6 min · 2026-03-21

How to tell if a tipster is truly profitable

That tipster who "hits 70%" might be losing you money. Here's how to actually measure whether someone is profitable.

Why hit rate isn't enough

A tipster with 70% hit rate at odds of 1.30 can be losing you money. One with 45% hit rate at odds of 2.50 can be making you rich.

A tipster can have a high hit rate and still not be profitable. To assess them seriously, you need to look at yield, ROI and CLV.

The key lies in the relationship between odds, stake and volume.

Tipster A: 70% hit rate
Average odds 1.30 — Yield: -2.1% — Loses money
VS
Tipster B: 48% hit rate
Average odds 2.40 — Yield: +5.2% — Makes money

Summary: Hit rate without context of odds and stake is useless. Measure yield, not hit rate.

Which metrics to analyse

The 4 key metrics for evaluating a tipster
Yield
Return on total amount staked
Average stake
Risk consistency
Volume
Minimum 500 picks to trust
CLV
Does it beat the closing line?

It's also worth checking which bookmakers the tipster uses and whether their odds are realistic given each bookmaker's margin.

These variables give a more complete picture of performance. If you haven't mastered the basics yet, here's how to calculate yield with a simple example.

Summary: Yield, average stake, volume and CLV. If a tipster won't give you access to these four metrics, you can't evaluate them seriously.

Track your bets, analyse your real yield and manage your bankroll with data, not intuition.

Try StakeMaster free →

Red flags

Red flags: No complete track record shared. Only shows screenshots of winning bets. Irregular stakes with no clear rationale. Odds that are no longer available when they're posted.

These factors make it hard to evaluate real profitability.

Key fact: Survivorship bias is brutal with tipsters. You only see those who had a good streak. The hundreds who failed disappeared silently. Don't confuse positive variance with skill.

Summary: If a tipster doesn't share their complete and verifiable track record, there's probably something they don't want you to see.

The importance of context

A good result over a short period doesn't guarantee consistency. It could simply be positive variance. You need to analyse large samples.

Sustained performance is what delivers value. Without a well-structured track record, comparing tipsters usually comes down to hunches and screenshots, so it's best to keep your bets properly recorded.

With StakeMaster: You can filter your bets by tipster and see the yield, profit and statistics for each one separately. So you know with data who's making you money and who's losing it.

Summary: At least 2-3 months of paper tracking before betting real money. Volume separates luck from skill.

Frequently asked questions

Is a tipster with positive yield always reliable?

Not necessarily. It depends on bet volume and yield consistency over time. A positive yield with fewer than 200 bets could be pure variance. Look for tipsters with at least 500 recorded bets and sustained yield over several months for a minimally reliable reference.

Can you trust screenshot results?

Hardly. Without a complete, verifiable track record, screenshots can show a cherry-picked selection of results. Survivorship bias and self-serving selection are very common. Look for tipsters who share their full history, ideally on a platform that records everything automatically.

How long should I follow a tipster before investing real money?

At least 2-3 months recording their picks on paper (no real money) to validate that results are real and consistent. This lets you check whether the odds they publish are actually available and whether yield holds outside favourable variance periods.

If you want to compare tipsters and analyse their performance with real data, you can record the bets and evaluate them from StakeMaster.

Start tracking for free →